Abby Minor is Bitch Media’s 2018 Writing Fellow in Sexual Politics
January marks the 46th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, which is why tens of thousands of antiabortion activists are choosing, as they have every year since 1974, such a chilly time of year to travel to Washington D.C. for the March for Life, a gathering that has grown steadily since its inception to become the largest pro-life event in the world. As theyâ€™ve done for decades, march participants will use the leading pro-life event to express the leading pro-life idea, that life begins at conception; the notion is jauntily expressed by the theme of this yearâ€™s march, â€œUnique from Day One.â€�
For those of us who work to reduce abortion stigma, such claims can be frustrating and send us in intellectual circles. We know that we are neither evil nor confused, and that our experiences of abortion have been marked by wisdom and care. And yet how can we prove that abortion doesnâ€™t end a life? How can we define â€œlife,â€� or refute someone elseâ€™s definition of when a human life begins?
I want to ask a different question: What if the issue of whether life begins at conception doesnâ€™t really matter? In other words, what if we simply owned that abortion is beneficial, essential, and sacredâ€”even if life does begin at conception?
Abortion care workers and pregnancy options counselors have long acknowledged that abortion involves a kind of death. Charlotte Taft, former president of the Abortion Care Network and a pioneering abortion provider and counselor, notes that just as joy and relief can show up in abortion experiences, â€œthere can [also] be grief, because we are talking about death, about not carrying a life forward, and we donâ€™t know how to talk about the ending of life in a way that honors life.â€� Melissa Madera, founder of The Abortion Diary, echoes Taft; Madera has listened to hundreds of people tell their abortion stories, and she notes that feelings about death can play a part in those stories. â€œEven though this is not a being that exists in the world already,â€� Madera told me, â€œweâ€™re deciding whether or not life will go onâ€”and there is death involved in that, in order to choose life, or a different life, for yourself.â€�
But this perspective is one that the mainstream pro-choice movement has shied away from, and Taft notes that thereâ€™s a tension between peopleâ€™s lived experiences and conventional pro-choice messaging. To acknowledge â€œthe complexity of [the] choice to not bring new life into the world, and in fact to end life,â€� she says, â€œis controversial even within the pro-choice movement because we donâ€™t know how to talk about the life and death part of abortion.â€�
Get Bitch Media’s top 9 reads of the week delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning! Sign up for the Weekly Reader:
We donâ€™t know how to have that conversation in large part because antiabortion forces have for so long shaped the terms of the debate. For centuries Western patriarchy, capitalism, mainline Christianity, and militarism have instilled and stoked fears about darkness, ambiguity, and death, laying the groundwork for contemporary antiabortion rhetoric. By the time Pope John Paul II described â€œa dramatic struggle between the â€˜culture of lifeâ€™ and â€˜the culture of deathâ€™â€� in the early 1990s, our culture had already grown to associate â€œlifeâ€� with goodness, and to profoundly stigmatize death. The Popeâ€™s stern coinages provided antiabortion activists and politicians with seemingly unimpeachable language to describe their positions: Using his rhetoric, they hail the March for Life as â€œpromoting a culture of life,â€� and decry Planned Parenthood for â€œleading the culture of death.â€� And while pro-choice commentators point out that pro-life policies remain oddly indifferent to actually improving peopleâ€™s lives, we have rarely stopped to question what exactly constitutes a culture of death, and whether such a culture is inherently bad.
Over the past decade, growing numbers of culture creators have been asking exactly those questions. In 2013, entrepreneur and writer Michael Hebb started the organization Death Over Dinner to bring people together to discuss the taboo of mortality; â€œThe way we die in western society is broken,â€� Hebb told The Guardian last October, â€œWe are death-illiterate.â€� Barbara Ehrenreichâ€™s newest book, 2018â€™s Natural Causes, begins from a similar premise, going on to explore and challenge the ways that â€œwellnessâ€� culture refuses to acknowledge the inevitability of dying. Then thereâ€™s Caitlin Doughty, a mortician who founded the wildly popular site The Order of the Good Death in 2011 to make space for â€œdeath acceptance.â€� An alternative death-care industry has flourished as well, such that death doula and death midwife trainings are available throughout the United States, with people as invested in â€œhome deathâ€� as many others are in home birth. Each one of these projects asks us to think about the toll that our fear of death takes on usâ€”and, further, to think about what a destigmatized relationship to death might look like.
In a culture so profoundly afraid of death, itâ€™s no wonder we have a hard time differentiating between murder and deathâ€”and that weâ€™re compelled to see any kind of death as unfortunate, violent, and bad.
These arenâ€™t necessarily simple questions or thought experiments, of course, particularly for people who are Black or brown, who are women, who are queer, who are trans. For those whose lives and deaths are regularly dismissed and whose deaths are so often a silent event at the periphery of a news story, what does an empowered relationship to death look like? For those who are busy fighting to live, does embracing death feel like an indulgence we canâ€™t afford? Yet death is, and must be, separable from misogynist and white-supremacist violence, from injustice and hatred. Murder and death are not the same thing.
This point is worth lingering on, especially in the context of abortion. In a culture so profoundly afraid of death, itâ€™s no wonder we have a hard time differentiating between murder and deathâ€”and that weâ€™re compelled to see any kind of death as unfortunate, violent, and bad. Such a perspective is evident not only in antiabortion rhetoric, but also in common pro-choice talking points; â€œIf youâ€™re so against abortion,â€� pro-choice folks say, â€œWhy arenâ€™t you against capital punishment, or war?â€� But such a comment conflates two very different kinds of death, implying that abortion involves retaliation, anger, and punishment. The truth is that people who have abortions do so for profoundly different reasons than those who wage war or implement the death penalty. â€œWomen are not the enemies of our children,â€� notes the Abortion Care Network, â€œeven those we decide not to bring into the world.â€� To see war and abortion as even marginally equivalent is to reinforce the binary by which the â€œculture of lifeâ€�/â€�culture of deathâ€� worldview prevails, a binary that whittles down lived complexitiesâ€”and, I might add, radically different biological contextsâ€”to a glaring, untenable black and white.
This binary has been a long time in the making. When Pythagoras constructed his table of opposites in the 6th century BC, he associated femaleness with evil and darknessâ€”Western shorthand for death. In fact, not only have women historically cared for the dead in many cultures, but death itself has often been represented as female: think the Keres of Greek mythology, the banshees of Irish mythology, and Mexicoâ€™s Santa Muerte, or Saint Death, a folk saint who has seen a revival in recent years. Such figures have traditionally held great power, mercy, and wisdom, and they gesture towards an important point: Itâ€™s not the binary by which we associate femaleness with death and darkness thatâ€™s ultimately the problem, but the desire to eradicate one entire half of experience.
Years ago, Charlotte Taft put up a sign outside her office in Texas: â€œAt this clinic we do sacred work that honors women and the circle of life and death,â€� it read. â€œWhen you come here bring only love.â€� Taft told me that sheâ€™s worked for decades to acknowledge death in the context of abortion not only because she understands firsthand how many of her clients need that language to make sense of their experience, but also because she sees an opportunity to shift public conversations. â€œItâ€™s not a question of whether or not abortion is killing,â€� Taft told me. â€œThe question is, how do you handle ending that life, and what does that mean to you?â€� For Taft, if we could get past the former question and focus on the latter, weâ€™d see better abortion counseling and care, reduced stigma, and improved outcomes for patients: â€œIf providers could help women reckon with the death part of abortion, it would help with the horrible dualism of this conversation. More women would understandâ€”you are not the first and last woman who is going to have the courage to say no to a life.â€�
The effects of publicly naming and owning such courage could ripple far beyond the realm of abortion. On a recent episode of the podcast Bliss and Grit, spiritual teacher Jeannie Zandi spoke about how ill-equipped our culture is to honor both blossom and rot, action and inaction, light and dark; her reflections reveal just how unsustainable the â€œculture of lifeâ€� crusade really is. If pro-life activists were successful in achieving a world absent the â€œdeathâ€� half of the Pythagorean table, theyâ€™d banish not only femaleness and darkness, but motion, multiplicity, and infinity; theyâ€™d force us to live in a blinding, relentless glare of light.
Like Zandi, Iâ€™d rather live in a world with room for both light and shadow; one with room for Santa Muerte, the female death saint described to me by my friend, the sound artist Amanda GutiÃ©rrez, in this way: â€œFor my grandmother and also for my great-grandmother, death represents a goddess, a female figure of justice, equity, and strength. It is because they were the third generation of the Zapotec indigenous culture, where death represented a step forward to another space of liberation and transcendence.â€�
If we want to change the conversation about abortionâ€”and about life itselfâ€”itâ€™s time for us to step forward into another space, time to acknowledge just how graceful, compassionate, and courageous â€œa culture of deathâ€� would really be. Instead of fleeing from ambiguity and darkness, such a culture would have the intellectual strength to reckon with Charlotte Taftâ€™s vision: â€œAbortion is a circle. Within that circle there are many contradictions, but there are no sides. You donâ€™t have to be defensive if you have already owned it.â€�